- Docente: Marco Antonio Bazzocchi
- Credits: 6
- Language: Italian
- Teaching Mode: Traditional lectures
- Campus: Bologna
-
Corso:
First cycle degree programme (L) in
History (cod. 0962)
Also valid for First cycle degree programme (L) in Humanities (cod. 8850)
First cycle degree programme (L) in Communication Sciences (cod. 8885)
Learning outcomes
By the end of the course the student has acquired a working knowledge of wide areas of twentieth-century literary history, with special emphasis on the relation between literature and historical, social, anthropological, and more broadly cultural phenomena. Study is assisted by secondary literature and face-to-face tuition and covers close reading of the text as well as problems of form, structure, composition, and reception.
Readings/Bibliography
Sezione monografica:
analisi e intepretazione dei seguenti testi:
1. R. Longhi, Caravaggio
2. P.P.Pasolini, La ricotta (film e sceneggiatura)
3. A. Banti, Artemisia
4. G. Bassani, Le storie ferraresi
5. L. Sciascia, Todo modo
6. G. Celati, Quattro novelle sulle apparenze
Gli studenti che portano il corso da 6 cfu e frequentano il primo modulo dovranno conoscere e saranno interrogati sui testi 1.2.3.
Per gli altri (12 cfu) è obbligatoria la conoscenza di tutti i testi.
Teaching methods
The course is based on the reading, the analysis and the discussion of the literary texts in biblioghaphy.
Assessment methods
Assessment consists of a viva voce examination aiming to assess the knowledge and critical skills acquired by the candidate during the course.
1. First-class marks will be awarded to candidates who demonstrate an ability to analyse texts in depth and to produce an organic overview of the topics covered in the course. Overall mark between 27 and 30 cum laude (high linguistic ability is required).
2. A mostly mnemonic knowledge of the subject, analytical skills lacking depth, and correct but not always apposite expression will result in a modest mark. Overall mark between 23 and 26.
3. Elementary knowledge, superficial understanding, poor analytical skills, and inapposite expression will lead to a pass or only slightly higher mark. Overall mark between 18 and 22.
4. Gaps in the candidate’s knowledge, inapposite language, and inadequate engagement with the secondary literature offered in the course will result in a fail mark.
Office hours
See the website of Marco Antonio Bazzocchi