- Docente: Sabrina Ragone
- Credits: 8
- SSD: IUS/21
- Language: English
- Teaching Mode: Traditional lectures
- Campus: Bologna
- Corso: Second cycle degree programme (LM) in Politics Administration and Organization (cod. 6776)
-
from Sep 15, 2025 to Nov 26, 2025
Learning outcomes
The course aims to provide students with a comprehensive understanding of the comparative dimension of the European legal space through primary institutions and principles, with a particular emphasis on solidarity. The course will lead the students to acquire and improve the following skills: techniques for reading and understanding constitutional norms, legislation and case law from different legal systems, as well as critical skills for the comparative examination of European constitutionalism; ability to find and understand legal sources of the European legal space; skills to elaborate innovative norms and policies in both the public and the private sector.
Course contents
Comparative Methodology
Practical and Theoretical Targets of Legal Comparison
European Legal Families and Political/Territorial Systems
European Constitutionalism and Comparative Understandings of the Principle of Solidarity
EU and Domestic Legal Framework of Solidarity
Solidarity in Inter-territorial relations
Financial, Migration, and Environmental Norms and Policies on Solidarity
Constitutional Adjudication and Interaction with European Courts
Readings/Bibliography
M. Bogdan, Concise Introduction to Comparative Law, 2013 (Chapter 2 “The uses of comparative law”, pp. 15-26; and Chapter 3, “Some problems connected with the study of foreign law”, pp. 29-41)
A. de Gregorio Merino, The Recovery Plan: Solidarity and the Living Constitution, in EU LAW IN TIMES OF PANDEMIC. The EU's legal response to COVID-19, Eu Law Press Live, 2021, pp. 33-44
G. Halmai, N. Chronowsk, “The decline of human dignity and solidarity through the misuse of constitutional identity: The case of Hungary since 2010”, in Human dignity and democracy in Europe: synergies, tensions and crises, edited by Daniel Bedford, Catherine Dupré, Gábor Halmai and Panos Kapotas, Northampton, Edward Elgar Publishing, 2022, pp. 177-199.
J. King, “Social rights in comparative constitutional theory”, in Comparative Constitutional Theory. Research Handbooks in Comparative Constitutional Law series, Northampton, Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, 2018, pp. 144-166.
P. Kubicek, "Illiberal Nationalism and the Backlash against Liberal Cosmopolitanism in Post-Communist Europe", Nationalism and Ethnic Politics, 28:3, 2022, pp. 332-350.
M. Klamert, “Loyalty and solidarity as general principles”, in Research handbook on general principles in EU law: constructing legal orders in Europe, Northampton, Edward Elgar Publishing, 2022, pp. 118-135.
U. Neergard, S. de Vries, “Whatever is Necessary... Will be Done”: Time for a Less One-Sided View on Solidarity in Europe in the Shadow of COVID-19, in EU LAW IN TIMES OF PANDEMIC. The EU's legal response to COVID-19, Eu Law Press Live, 2021, pp. 75-94
S. Ragone, “European Comparative Law: Reasons for "Enhanced Comparison" and Role of the CJEU”, in Revista de Derecho Político, 2021, pp. 297-325
S. Ragone, G. Moreno González, “The Catalan Issue from a Comparative Constitutional Perspective”, in AA. VV., Catalan Independence and the Crisis of Sovereignty, Cham, Palgrave Macmillan, 2021, pp. 223 – 238
S. Ragone, G. Smorto, Comparative Law: A Very Short Introduction, OUP, 2023
Tuominen, T., Salminen, M., & Halonen, K.-M. (2022). The European Union’s responses to the COVID-19 crisis: How to fight a pandemic with the internal market. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 29(4), 451-467
F. de Witte, Justice in the EU. The Emergence of Transnational Solidarity, Oxford University Press, 2015, pp. 79-121.
Teaching methods
The class adopts both traditional methods and dialogic learning methods. Reccommended materials will be accompanied by the analysis of judgments and statutes or constitutional amendments, as well as videos.
Students are required to engage and participate in class discussions on previously assigned topics and materials, as well as present specific research exercises.
Assessment methods
Full-time Students: constant monitoring in class and one/two presentations in class or paper.
Non full-time students: written and oral final test on the entire syllabus.
Teaching tools
PPT, judgments, legal texts.
Links to further information
https://site.unibo.it/jm-module-eusocial/en
Office hours
See the website of Sabrina Ragone
SDGs


This teaching activity contributes to the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals of the UN 2030 Agenda.