- Docente: Luciano Messori
- Credits: 6
- SSD: SECS-P/03
- Language: English
- Teaching Mode: Traditional lectures
- Campus: Bologna
-
Corso:
Second cycle degree programme (LM) in
Law, Economics and Governance (cod. 5811)
Also valid for Second cycle degree programme (LM) in Law and Economics (cod. 6762)
Learning outcomes
At the end of the module, students: - know the theories and frameworks to systematically analyse the role played by rankings and indicators as market-solutions to mitigate the market failures due to incomplete and asymmetric information; - can analyze empirically the diffusion in the use of rankings and ratings – and more generally of performance indicators - in the main markets for trust services with specific reference to financial, health and education services.
Course contents
Markets with asymmetric information: private and public regulatory tools
- Allocative effects of asymmetric information
- Contractual solutions and market regulation
- Quality disclosure and third-party certification
- Accreditation, ratings and rankings
- Credit Rating Agencies
The effects of ratings and rankings
- Financial and insurance markets
- Professional services (health, education and legal services)
Readings/Bibliography
The reading list and the slides for this course will be available on Virtuale.
Teaching methods
Classroom lectures.
Assessment methods
Students who regularly attend lectures during the final two class sessions will be required to give a 15–20 minute presentation on one of the topics covered in the course (maximum score: 20 points).
At the end of the course, all students must take a written test consisting of 2–3 open-ended questions (maximum score: 12 points).
Students who choose not to give an in-class presentation will instead take a written test on the day of the exam. This test will require them to develop a short essay based on an outline provided by the instructor, to be completed within 90 minutes (maximum score: 20 points).
Students may choose the assessment method that best aligns with their academic background. However, they are expected to engage with the proposed topics with a high level of rigor and appropriateness, considering the interdisciplinary nature of the issues discussed.
Academic dishonesty in any form will not be tolerated. In order to take the exam, students must be registered on Almaesami.
Students with specific learning disorders (SLDs), or with temporary or permanent disabilities, are strongly encouraged to contact the appropriate university office in advance (https://site.unibo.it/studenti-con-disabilita-e-dsa/it ). The office will evaluate individual needs and recommend any necessary accommodations. These recommendations must be submitted no later than 15 days prior to the relevant academic activity for approval by the course instructor, who will assess their appropriateness in light of the course’s learning objectives.
The grade will go from 30 to 18, depending on the level of understanding of the relevant material, and the quality of the writing output. Student have the right to refuse a passing grade only once.
30-27
-Outstanding grasp of the course material.
-Excellent writing output
26-23
-Substantial understanding of the course material.
-Good writing output
25-22
-Decent understanding of the course material.
-Decent writing output
21-18
-Sufficient understanding of the course material.
-Sufficient writing output.
Negative assessment
-Scarce understanding of the course material.
-Scarce writing output.
Teaching tools
Blackboard and chalk. Slides.
Office hours
See the website of Luciano Messori
SDGs


This teaching activity contributes to the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals of the UN 2030 Agenda.