- Docente: Giorgio Volpe
- Credits: 6
- SSD: M-FIL/01
- Language: Italian
- Teaching Mode: Traditional lectures
- Campus: Bologna
-
Corso:
First cycle degree programme (L) in
Philosophy (cod. 9216)
Also valid for First cycle degree programme (L) in Foreign Languages and Literature (cod. 0979)
First cycle degree programme (L) in Philosophy (cod. 9216)
-
from Apr 08, 2026 to May 20, 2026
Learning outcomes
At the end of the course you will master the core concepts of epistemology (truth, belief, epistemic justification, evidence); you will have a basic understanding of the problem of scepticism and the analysis of knowledge; and you will be acquainted with som e of the main views which are at the centre of current debates on such topics. Besides, you will have built up an initial ability to do philosophical analysis by devising examples and counterexamples, and a capacity to recognise the structure of the argume nts you meet.
Course contents
You will be introduced to some of the main issues of contemporary epistemology. The focus will be on the problem of scepticism (15 hours) and the analysis of propositional knowledge (15 hours). Both topics will be introduced with an eye to their historical origins and then addressed more thoroughly through the lens of some key contemporary epistemological debates.
Readings/Bibliography
Compulsory reading:
Plato, Theaetetus (any edition), I-VIII (142a - 153d7); XXXVIII (200c7 - 201b5).
R. Descartes, Meditations on First Philosophy. First Meditation (any edition).
E. Gettier, La credenza vera giustificata è conoscenza?, in A. Coliva et al. (eds), Teorie della conoscenza, Cortina, Milano 2015, pp. 37-40.
R. Nozick, La conoscenza, in A. Coliva et al. (eds), Teorie della conoscenza, Cortina, Milano 2015, pp. 41-58 (estratti).
R. Nozick, Spiegazioni filosofiche, il Saggiatore, Milano 1987, pp. 197-201, 230-245.
D. Pritchard, Sensibilità, sicurezza ed epistemologia anti-fortuna, in A. Coliva et al. (eds), Teorie della conoscenza, Cortina, Milano 2015, pp. 77-103.
E. Sosa, Un’epistemologia delle virtù, in A. Coliva et al. (eds), Teorie della conoscenza, Cortina, Milano 2015, pp. 59-76.
T. Williamson, La conoscenza e i suoi limiti, in A. Coliva et al. (eds), Teorie della conoscenza, Cortina, Milano 2015, pp. 105-129 (excerpts).
K. DeRose, Come risolvere il problema scettico, in A. Coliva et al. (eds), Teorie della conoscenza, Cortina, Milano 2015, pp. 295-318.
C. Wright, Giustificazione di default (e fondamenti gratis)?, in A. Coliva et al. (a cura di), Teorie della conoscenza, Cortina, Milano 2015, pp. 343-370(excerpts).
J. Pryor, Che cosa c'è di sbagliato nell'argomento di Moore?, in A. Coliva et al. (eds), Teorie della conoscenza, Cortina, Milano 2015, pp. 371-401(excerpts).
Suggested reading:
T. Piazza, Che cos'è la conoscenza, Rome: Carocci 2017, pp. 1-102.
Students not attending lectures:
Same compulsory readings. However, students not attending lectures may benefit from reading in addition pages 1-102 of Piazza's book.
N.B.: You can read the English texts instead of the Italian translations listed above.
Teaching methods
Three two-hour lectures per week in the fourth term, half devoted to the problem of scepticism (15 hours), half to the analysis of knowledge (15 hours).
Attendance to lectures is warmly recommended: it is the best way to become familiar with the background and tools that are necessary to understand the texts and an opportunity to contribute to whole class discussions.
Assessment methods
Oral examination. The viva will assess whether you have achieved the learning outcomes of the course. You will need to show that you are familiar with the main views of human knowledge that have emerged during the history of Western philosophy, especially in the twentieth century, as well as that you have acquired the terminological and conceptual competence required to understand contemporary debates on the problem of scepticism and the nature of knowledge, especially the notions of truth, belief and epistemic justification.
Grade assessment criteria
Grade range below 18 – Fail. Poor knowledge of core material, a significant inability to engage with the discipline. Very poor presentation.
Grade range 18-21 – Pass. Limited and superficial knowledge of the subject, a significant inability to follow the thread of the discussion. Presentation with many inadequacies.
Grade range 21-23 – Adequate. The knowledge is superficial, but the thread of the discussion has been consistently grasped. Presentation with some inadequacies.
Grade range 24-26 – Acceptable. Elementary knowledge of the key principles and concepts. The presentation is occasionally weak.
Grade range 27-29 – Good. Comprehensive knowledge. Good presentation.
30 – Very Good. Detailed knowledge with hints of critical thinking. Very good presentation.
30 cum laude – Outstanding. Excellent knowledge and depth of understanding. Excellent presentation.
During the viva you will not be allowed to use any written material, either on paper or in electronic format.
N.B.: If Philosophy of Knowledge (1) is taken as part of the Knowledge and Language integrated course, the final evaluation will concern the integrated course and will involve assessment of achievement of the learning outcomes both in Philosophy of Knowledge (1) and in Philosophy of Language (1). However, it will be possible to take both exams together or separately at different exam sessions.
Exam sessions
During the 2025/2026 academic year, exam sessions are scheduled in the following months: May, July, September, October, and December 2026; January and March 2027.
Students with disabilities and Specific Learning Disorders (SLD)
Students with disabilities or Specific Learning Disorders have the right to special adjustments according to their condition, following an assessment by the Service for Students with Disabilities and SLD. Please do not contact the instructor but get in touch with the Service directly to schedule an appointment. It will be the responsibility of the Service to determine the appropriate adjustments.
For more information, visit the page: https://site.unibo.it/studenti-con-disabilita-e-dsa/en/for-students.
It is recommended that students contact the University office in advance. Any proposed adjustments must be submitted at least 15 days in advance for the instructor’s approval, who will evaluate their appropriateness in relation to the learning objectives of the course.
Teaching tools
The teacher will use slides. These will then be made available for download on Virtuale.
Office hours
See the website of Giorgio Volpe