28098 - History of the Scientific Thought (1) (LM)

Learning outcomes

At the end of the course the student acquires critical tools to: interpret primary and secondary sources on the history of scientific thought (contextualized in the philosophical culture, technical, socio-political, institutional of their time); perform archival research; produce various kinds of papers (reviews, critical, articles, essays).

Course contents

First lesson: 14 marzo 2018

Title of the course: "Extraterrestrial Civilizations from Galileo Galilei to SETI Project"

Mercoledi': Via Centotrecento, Aula D, ore 13-15 - Giovedi': Via Centotrecento, AULA D, ore 15-17 - Venerdi': Via Centotrecento, AULA D, ore 15-17.

The course will be devoted to the analysis of the history of idea of extraterrestrial life, from Galileo Galilei to the contemporary science. Particular attention will be paid to the analysis of the role of science and technology in contemporary democracies, and to the relationship between science and other forms of knowledge and communication (philosophy, religion, magic, literature, art, cinema, comics, etc.).

Readings/Bibliography

ATTENDING STUDENTS

1) G. Giorello, E. Sindoni, Un mondo di mondi. Alla ricerca della vita intelligente nell'universo, Milano, Raffaello Cortina Editore, 2016.

2) M. Ciardi, Il mistero degli antichi astronauti. Gli extraterrestri nel passato, Roma, Carocci, 2017.

NON-ATTENDING STUDENTS

1) G. Giorello, E. Sindoni, Un mondo di mondi. Alla ricerca della vita intelligente nell'universo, Milano, Raffaello Cortina Editore, 2016.

2) M. Ciardi, Il mistero degli antichi astronauti. Gli extraterrestri nel passato, Roma, Carocci, 2017.

3) M. Ciardi, Galileo e Harry Potter. La magia puo' aiutare la scienza?, Roma, Carocci, 2014.

Teaching methods

The teaching method may vary in relation to the number, demands and inclinations of students.  It may therefore shift from the traditional lecture to open discussion involving participants, and the presentation of papers

Assessment methods

The exam will take the form of an oral discussion and the student will be assessed according to the knowledge he has acquired, his ability to provide a clear summary of the topics covered and his critical handling of the material. He will be expected to refer to both the exam bibliography and the texts read and discussed during the lectures.

The assessment will concentrate particularly on the skill displayed by the student in handling the sources and material in the exam bibliography and his ability to find and use information and examples to illustrate and correlate the various themes and problems addressed in the course.

Top marks will be awarded to a student displaying an overall understanding of the topics discussed during the lectures, combined with a critical approach to the material and a confident and effective use of the appropriate terminology.
Average marks will be awarded to a student who has memorized the main points of the material and is able to summarise them satisfactorily and provide an effective critical commentary, while failing to display a complete command of the appropriate terminology. A student will be deemed to have failed the exam if he displays significant errors in his understanding and failure to grasp the overall outlines of the subject, together with a poor command of the appropriate terminology.

Evaluation levels:

30 cum laude: excellent performance showing soundness of knowledge, rich discursive articulation, appropriate expression, interest of critical contribution;

30: Excellent performance, complete, and appropriate knowledge, well-articulated and appropriately expressed, with interesting critical contributions;

29-27: Good performance, more than satisfactory knowledge, correct expression.

26-24: Standard performance, essential knowledge, but not comprehensive and / or not always correctly expressed;

23-21: Sufficient performance, general but superficial knowledge; often inappropriate expression and/or confused articulation of speech;

20-18: Poor performance, sufficient expression and articulation of speech with significant gaps;

< 18: Insufficient performance, knowledge absent or very incomplete, lack of orientation in the discipline, poor and seriously flawed expression.

Teaching tools

Teaching will use power point, both for the specific indication of themes and works, both for viewing images (artwork, maps, etc.). There will be a wide consultation of texts and materials on the Web.

Links to further information

http://www.unibo.it/docenti/marco.ciardi

Office hours

See the website of Marco Ciardi