00815 - Criminal Procedure (P-Z)

Academic Year 2017/2018

  • Docente: Renzo Orlandi
  • Credits: 15
  • Language: Italian
  • Teaching Mode: Traditional lectures
  • Campus: Bologna
  • Corso: Single cycle degree programme (LMCU) in Law (cod. 0659)

Learning outcomes

Fundamental rights of the person as stated in the Italian Constitution, the European Convention on Human Rights, the EU Fondamntali Rights Charter and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. Importance in the theory of criminal prosecution and judicial practice.

The judicial institution and the police organization in the context of the overall stately reality. Problematic relations between judiciary and politics.

Acquire awareness of the dynamic tension that characterizes the procedural norms, in the permed contrast between individual rights and prevention/detection needs of crimes.

Ability to grasp the many facets of the procedural phenomenon, placing themselves from the different viewpoints of the subjects involved: Judge, prosecutor, police, defendant and his defender, victim of the offence.

Course contents

FOR STUDENTS OF THE ORDINARY COURS

Occupying both semesters, the program is divided into two parts.

The first semester will be devoted to the illustration of the fundamental rights of the person drawn from the main sources of legislation (Constitution-ECHR-Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU) and which serve as a guide for both legislative activity and judicial interpretation. A reasoned illustration of the Constitutional rules governing the organisation and exercise of criminal jurisdiction will follow. Finally, the main rules of the Code of Criminal Procedure governing the so-called static part, corresponding to the first three books of the code itself, will be examined in a critical key: Subjects; Acts; Rules of evidence.

The second semester will be dedicated to the "dynamic part " of the code. Will in particular dealt with the following topics, with frequent references to the law cases:

Preliminary investigation, explained from the point of view of the subjects who gradually appear on the scene: Police, prosecutor, person subjected to investigations and his defender, judge of preliminary investigations in its functions of control and guarantee.

Preliminary hearing: purpose of the hearing; Its establishment, conduct and epilogue. The rule of judgement in the preliminary hearing. Decree of referral to judgment and formation of procedural dossiers.

Preventive detention and seizure. Prerequisites of precautionary measures and legitimately pursued requirements with their adoption. Type of precautionary measures. Evolution and extinction of the precautionary affair. Appeals against that measures (Request for review, appeal, appeal for cassation).

Special Proceedings (plea, abbreviated judgement, immediate judgment, fast judgement, procedure by decree, Suspension of trial with probation test).

Hearing judgement: preparatory acts; Preliminary questions to the debate; Test requests; Hearing statement; Discussion and deliberation of the judgment.

Ordinary and extraordinary appeals: general rules and discipline of the individual means of appeal (appeal; appeal for cassation; review of the judgment).

Ne bis in idem (double jeopardy)

* * *

FOR STUDENTS OF THE ITALIAN-FRENCH COURSE

The program coincides in a large part with the lessons carried out in the second semester. However, for a better understanding of the so-called dynamic part, we recommend-if possible-the frequency also to the lessons of the first semester. At the request of the students concerned, meetings and lessons will be set aside to meet any needs of understanding and to better adapt the teaching to the attendees this degree course.

Readings/Bibliography

FOR STUDENTS OF THE ORDINARY COURSE

Only suggested text: G. Conso, V. Grevi, M. Bargis, Compendio di Procedura penale, Padua, Cedam, 2016.

The restriction of choice is justified by the fact that this manual-albeit of arduous reading-exposes the discipline in problematic terms. The same method is followed in the course and also the examinations are conducted by scouring the applicant's critical abilities. It is therefore not advisable to choose other manuals, especially those written in a flat and Aproblematica, which invite the student to a mnemonic preparation, detached-as such-from the real understanding of the phenomenon studied.

All students (attending and unattending) must have an updated code. Any regulatory changes that have occurred in the meantime will be taken into account in class, but will not be subject to any questions in the examination. In other words, until the exit of the next manual (certainly for the entire academic year 2017/2018) the student will be able to prepare the exam on the 2016 edition, even if it does not result in some updated part.

* * *

FOR STUDENTS OF THE ITALIAN-FRENCH COURS

G. Conso, V. Grevi, M. Bargis, Compendio di procedura penale, Padova, Cedam, 2016, limited to chapters I-II-III-IV-V-VIII-IX and chapter X (first six paragraphs).

Useful tip: the cap. I of the Compendio di procedura penale (dedicated to the subjects of the criminal procedings) may be replaced by the essay by R. Orlandi, Organizzazione della giustizia penale, in P. Biavati. D. Cavallini, R. Orlandi, Assetti della giustizia civile e penale in Italia, Bologna, Il Mulino, 2016: text of easier comprehension, especially for French students.).

 

 

 

Teaching methods

The method will be that of the oral lesson, with reasoned reading of the main norms indicated in the program and frequent references to known cases to better understand the meaning of the institutes from time to time taken into account.

In agreement with the students and on their solicitation can be organized collateral activities to the course (cycles of films, meetings with protagonists of the judicial life), useful for a more concrete approach with the reality of the criminal process.

At the end of the course (mid-May) there is a moot court to which some of the attending students will recite in the roles of judge, accuser, defender of the civilian parties and counsel of the defendant.

Assessment methods

Oral examination.

For the only attendees it will be possible to support a partial interview at each of the four appeals of the winter session, on the basis of the programme carried out during the 1st semester. The interview can only be sustained once.

In the event of a positive outcome, a provisional vote will be awarded, which shall contribute-to a weighted measure-to compose the final vote, after the applicant has supported the second part of the examination, which concerns the programme carried out in the second part of the course. Except in exceptional cases to be justified personally, the second part of the examination must be supported by the September 2018 appeal.

In the event of a failure of the partial interview, the examination shall be carried out in full from the May 2018 appeal. The same applies to the candidate who refused the vote-positive-of the interview itself.

Teaching tools

Additional material (documents, audio files etc.) useful for the best success of the teaching will be made available to all the students on the AMS campus website. Communication of this will be given in class.

Office hours

See the website of Renzo Orlandi